Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret

25 Ohio St. 3d 132
25 Ohio B. 177
495 N.E.2d 433
1986 Ohio LEXIS 709

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jul 23, 1986
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Celebrezze, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), a lawyer shall not violate a Disciplinary Rule; DR 1-102(A)(3), a lawyer shall not engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude; and DR 1-102(A)(6), a lawyer shall not engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.

We concur in the board’s conclusion regarding the appropriate sanction. Therefore, it is the order of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.