Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw

  • 15 Ohio St. 3d 125
  • 15 Ohio B. 275
  • 472 N.E.2d 1075
  • 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1277
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 31, 1984
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.9%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful review of the evidence, this court finds that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6), DR 7-101 (A)(3), and DR 9-102(A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Accordingly, we concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners.

Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.