Opinion

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

  • 4 Ohio St. 3d 107
  • 4 Ohio B. 355
  • 447 N.E.2d 746
  • 1983 Ohio LEXIS 674
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 13, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Holmes
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Fourth, Holmes, Locher, Only, Stephenson, Sweeney
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

The opinion

Holmes, J.,

concurring. I concur in the court’s resolution of the first issue, which relates to the amortization of the cancelled nuclear generating stations, solely on the basis of stare decisis. However, I believe that the proper approach to this question was set forth in Justice Paul W. Brown’s dissenting opinion in Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 153, 168 [ 21 O.O.3d 96 ], which I joined.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.