Opinion

State v. Beasley

  • 4 Ohio St. 3d 24
  • 4 Ohio B. 71
  • 446 N.E.2d 154
  • 1983 Ohio LEXIS 658
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 16, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Fifth, Holmes, Locher, Mahoney, Ninth, Only, Putman, Sweeney
Cited by
6 cases

The opinion

Clifford F. Brown, J.,

concurring. I concur separately expressing the view that the opinion of Judge Putman accurately determined that the undisputed facts found by the trial court conclusively establish the affirmative defense that the gun was lawfully transported for a lawful purpose, and that the opinion of Chief Justice Celebrezze accurately concludes that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt an essential element of the offense, namely, that the weapon was “ready at hand” within the meaning of R.C. 2923.12(A).

Holmes, J., concurs in judgment only.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.