Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Merillat

  • 68 Ohio St. 2d 146
  • 22 Ohio Op. 3d 382
  • 429 N.E.2d 158
  • 1981 Ohio LEXIS 634
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 16, 1981
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Krupansky, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 71.6%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record in this cause and the findings of fact of the board of commissioners, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to find respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), (5) and (6) and DR 6-101 (A)(2) and (3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

We concur with the board’s recommendation and hereby indefinitely suspend respondent, Paul Merillat, from the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.