Opinion

Bukky v. Painesville Telegraph & Lake Geauga Printing Co.

  • 68 Ohio St. 2d 45
  • 22 Ohio Op. 3d 183
  • 428 N.E.2d 405
  • 7 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2309
  • 1981 Ohio LEXIS 616
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 10, 1981
Status
Published
Author
Holmes
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Krupansky, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

Holmes, J.,

dissenting. It being my conclusion that this case was inappropriate for the granting of a summary judgment, I would affirm the Court of Appeals. In my view, there yet remained issues of fact pertaining to the existence of the reckless disregard of the truth in the investigation and reporting of the items contained in the subject published article.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.