Opinion

State ex rel. Hamlin v. Collins

65 Ohio St. 2d 63
19 Ohio Op. 3d 259
418 N.E.2d 398
1981 Ohio LEXIS 447

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Mar 25, 1981
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by: 7 cases
Authority: More cited than 92.2%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole issue before this court is whether mandamus is a proper remedy for appellant to pursue the back pay allegedly due to him. There is no question, based on past decisions of this court, that mandamus is proper under these facts. See State, ex rel. Colangelo, v. McFaul (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 200 ; State, ex rel. Martin, v. Columbus (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 261 ; State, ex rel. Osborn, v. Jackson (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 41 ; State, ex rel. Dean, v. Huddle (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 234 ; Monaghan v. Richley (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 190 .

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.