Opinion

Rio Indal, Inc. v. Lindley

  • 62 Ohio St. 2d 283
  • 16 Ohio Op. 3d 326
  • 405 N.E.2d 291
  • 1980 Ohio LEXIS 739
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 4, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Holmes
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Eleventh, Herbert, Hofstetter, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
4 cases

construing allocation provision in corporate franchise tax to achieve the objective of taxing the fair value of Ohio business

How later courts described this case

  • construing allocation provision in corporate franchise tax to achieve the objective of taxing the fair value of Ohio business
  • using general statute-construing aids to construe allocation provision

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Holmes, J.,

dissenting. I must dissent in that, in my view, the Board of Tax Appeals reasonably found that the amounts involved here were received for technical services, and were derived from sources outside the United States, and as such were deductible from net income pursuant to R. C. 5733.04(I)(2).

I would affirm the order of the Board of Tax Appeals.

Hofstetter, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.