Opinion

State ex rel. Luke v. Corrigan

  • 61 Ohio St. 2d 86
  • 15 Ohio Op. 3d 123
  • 399 N.E.2d 1208
  • 1980 Ohio LEXIS 617
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 23, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Holmes
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
7 cases

affirming dismissal of mandamus complaint on the basis that relators had an adequate remedy at law by way of an action in replevin to recover personal property seized under a search warrant

How later courts described this case

  • affirming dismissal of mandamus complaint on the basis that relators had an adequate remedy at law by way of an action in replevin to recover personal property seized under a search warrant

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Holmes, J.,

dissenting. I cannot concur with the majority here in that requiring a private citizen from whom property has been taken to file a replevin action requiring a bond and other attendant costs is not an adequate remedy at law. I would allow the writ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.