Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Pandilidis

  • 57 Ohio St. 2d 47
  • 11 Ohio Op. 3d 158
  • 385 N.E.2d 1317
  • 1979 Ohio LEXIS 363
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 28, 1979
Status
Published
Author
Connors
On the bench
Brown, Celebeezze, Connors, Eighth, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Pryatel, Sixth, Sweeney
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

The opinion

Connors, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the per curiam opinion, being mindful of this court’s policy beginning with, and followed thereafter in, Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77 .

The recommendation of this court’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline called for a public reprimand.

Heedful of this court’s policy since Stein , I nevertheless feel that, in view of the findings of facts and the report and recommendation of the board of commissioners, a public reprimand would be sufficient discipline.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.