Opinion

Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.

  • 56 Ohio St. 2d 191
  • 10 Ohio Op. 3d 352
  • 383 N.E.2d 575
  • 1978 Ohio LEXIS 678
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 6, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Leach
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Eoncur, Herbert, Leach, Locher, Sweeney
Cited by
55 cases

claim that the telephone company invaded its customer's privacy was actionable in common pleas court

How later courts described this case

  • claim that the telephone company invaded its customer's privacy was actionable in common pleas court
  • claim that telephone company invaded customer’s privacy was actionable in common pleas court

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Leach, C. J.,

concurring in part. I concur in the syllabus and in the judgment of this court reversing the first, second and fourth claims for relief. Since, because the third claim for relief did not properly allege any invasion of privacy, I believe it futile to remand the cause for further action in the Court of Common Pleas.

Herbert and P. Brown, JJ., eoncur in the foregoing concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.