Opinion

State v. Wentworth

  • 54 Ohio St. 2d 171
  • 8 Ohio Op. 3d 162
  • 375 N.E.2d 424
  • 1978 Ohio LEXIS 542
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 3, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Herbert
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Fourth, Herbert, Looher, Neill, Stephenson, Sweeney
Cited by
57 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

The opinion

Herbert, J.,

concurs in the judgment. I do not believe it is necessary to rely upon so-called speedy trial statutes in order to protect appellant’s constitutional rights. The length of the continuance and the circumstances surrounding it provide sufficient grounds for this order of reversal. State v. Pugh (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 153, 155 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.