Opinion

Lippert v. Engle

  • 52 Ohio St. 2d 67
  • 6 Ohio Op. 3d 234
  • 369 N.E.2d 1044
  • 1977 Ohio LEXIS 459
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 16, 1977
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Locher, Neill, Sweeney
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 94.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Mandamus is not available where appellant has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141 ; State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 1 ; State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 72 ; and In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 130 .

The judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint, is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.