Opinion

Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Haffner

  • 52 Ohio St. 2d 41
  • 6 Ohio Op. 3d 155
  • 368 N.E.2d 845
  • 1977 Ohio LEXIS 465
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 2, 1977
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Locher, Neill, Sweeney
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 88.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record of the hearing, the finding of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, and the briefs of relator and respondent, we conclude there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility, specifically DR 1-102 (A) (4) and (5).

We confirm the recommendation of the board, that respondent, Walter S. Haffner, be publicly reprimanded. It is so ordered.

Judgment accordingly.

0 ’Neill, C. J., Herbert, ' Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.