Opinion

Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld

  • 47 Ohio St. 2d 12
  • 1 Ohio Op. 3d 8
  • 351 N.E.2d 181
  • 1976 Ohio LEXIS 665
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 7, 1976
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Potter, Sixth, Stern
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 84.7%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole factor and consideration which distinguishes these cases from the analysis in Nokes v. Nokes (1976), 47 Ohio St. 2d 1 , .decided this day, -is that such support order was formulated by incorporating parental separation agreements -into .the divorce decree. :■

Inasmuch as under Ohio law, a separation agreement of the parties-loses its nature, as a .contract the'moment it is adopted by the court and incorporated into a decree of divorce, we find that such distinguishing factor is of insufficient force to prevent the application hereto of the principles enunciated in N olees.

Therefore,-in light-of Nglees, the judgment in case No. 75-197 is affirmed and'the judgments in cases Nos. 75-144 and 75-482 are reversed.

Judgment affirmed in case No. 75-197-.

Judgments reversed in cases Nos. 75-144 and 75-482.

0 ’Neill,, C. J.," Potter, Stern, W.' Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.. .

Corrigan and Celebrezze,-JJ., dissent. ■

Potter, J., of the Sixth Appellate District- .sitting fob Herbert, J. ,

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.