Opinion

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Gerken

  • 40 Ohio St. 2d 51
  • 69 Ohio Op. 2d 348
  • 320 N.E.2d 657
  • 1974 Ohio LEXIS 370
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 29, 1974
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent does not object to the findings of fact and the recommendation of the board. In' fact, he “consents to this court’s confirmation of said board’s findings of fact and recommendation and the entry of a disciplinary order pursuant thereto.” ■

Accordingly, the report of the Board of Commission *52 ers on Grievances and Discipline is confirmed, and the respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

O’Neill, C. J., HeRbeRt, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.