Opinion

Maumee Valley Broadcasting Ass'n v. Porterfield

  • 29 Ohio St. 2d 95
  • 58 Ohio Op. 2d 192
  • 279 N.E.2d 863
  • 54 A.L.R. 3d 1200
  • 1972 Ohio LEXIS 499
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 16, 1972
Status
Published
Author
Schneider
On the bench
Article, Cobeigan, Constitution, Directed, Duncan, Hekbeet, Keens, Kerns, Leach, Neill, Ohio, Place, Pursuant, Resignation, Schneider, Second, Stead, Steen, Supreme, Syllabus
Cited by
11 cases

describing the “factual determination” of the Board of Tax Appeals in deciding whether the corporation was a church for purposes of the sales-tax statute

How later courts described this case

  • describing the “factual determination” of the Board of Tax Appeals in deciding whether the corporation was a church for purposes of the sales-tax statute

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Schneider, J.,

dissenting. I cannot agree that appel-lee’s operations, however meritorious they are, constitute a “church” as the General Assembly must have used that term. Appellee has no doctrine and no government for its members with its concomitant, discipline.

It may well be operated for a “charitable purpose,” in the broad sense, but the Board of Tax Appeals properly rejected that contention for the reason that, for a sales tax exemption, the term is most narrowly and specifically defined.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.