Opinion

Cuyahoga County Board of Revision v. Federal Reserve Bank

16 Ohio St. 2d 42
45 Ohio Op. 2d 325
242 N.E.2d 571
1968 Ohio LEXIS 336

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Dec 4, 1968
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Taft, Zimmerman
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 46.7%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant contends that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable and unlawful *43 because the board failed to consider all the evidence in determining the true value in money of the subject-property and because the board rejected all the testimony of the appellant’s expert witness.

A complete and careful examination of the entire record in this cause discloses that the finding of the Board of Tax Appeals is supported by creditable and substantial evidence and that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is not unreasonable or unlawful.

The decision of the board is, therefore, affirmed on authority of Bd. of Revision v. Fodor, 15 Ohio St. 2d 52 .

Decision affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.