Opinion

State ex rel. Greimann v. Hook

3 Ohio St. 2d 64
32 Ohio Op. 2d 48
209 N.E.2d 200
1965 Ohio LEXIS 446

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jul 7, 1965
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Ezerns, Herbert, Kerns, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Second, Taft, Zimmerman
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The resolution of respondents of 1958, accepting, in general terms, Wilshire Circle as a public road, was effective as an acceptance of only the 1515.15 feet specifically described in relators’ petition. The second resolution accepted only an additional 1930.57 feet of that portion of the road offered for dedication in the 1962 petition. Thus, there having been no acceptance of the 850-foot portion in question, respondents are under no duty specifically enjoined by law to repair and maintain the unaccepted portion. The writ of mandamus is, therefore, denied.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, EZerns, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for O’Neill, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.