Opinion

King v. Garnes

  • 36 Ohio Misc. 187
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 26, 1973
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellees contend that the filing was not timely because it was not filed within ten days after the administrator’s decision on reconsideration was mailed to appellant. However, an examination of the record discloses no evidence to show when the decision was, in fact, mailed, nor did the employer attempt to assert a date of mailing before the Board of Review.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, CorrigaN, SterN, Celebrezze, W. BrowN and P. BrowN, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.