Opinion

North Carolina Board of Architecture v. Cannon

  • 264 N.C. 614
  • 142 S.E.2d 651
  • 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1251
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Jun 18, 1965
Status
Published
Author
Ctouam
On the bench
Ctouam
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.6%

The opinion

Per Ctouam.

Plaintiff has three assignments of error to the effect that the court erred in sustaining defendant’s objections to three questions that it asked its witness, John A. Parham, Chief Building Inspector for the city of Durham. These three assignments of error are overruled on the ground that plaintiff failed to insert in the record what the answ'ers of Parham would have been had he been permitted to respond. Board of Education v. Mann, 250 N.C. 493 , 109 S.E. 2d 175 .

Plaintiff’s fourth and last assignment of error is that the court erred in rendering and signing the judgment as set forth herein. This assignment of error is overruled. The judgment below is affirmed upon authority of the North Carolina Board of Architecture v. C. A. Lee, ante, 602, .S.E. 2d ., decided this day.

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.