Opinion

Vogelsong v. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy

  • 123 Ohio App. 3d 260
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Sep 30, 1997
Status
Published
Author
Harsha
On the bench
Harsha, Kline, Stephenson
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

Harsha, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the majority in all regards except one. The board denied appellant credit against his three-year license suspension for the time his license was temporarily suspended under the prehearing order. To allow the board to summarily suspend the appellant’s license without a hearing, and then to continue the hearing on the final suspension for ninety-two days after he requested a hearing, while denying credit for the temporary suspension violates appellant’s right to due process of law. Thus, I dissent from affirming the trial court in toto.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.