Opinion

State ex rel. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati Highway Co. v. Industrial Commission

  • 70 Ohio App. 2d 41
  • 24 Ohio Op. 3d 37
  • 434 N.E.2d 279
  • 1980 Ohio App. LEXIS 9705
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Aug 12, 1980
Status
Published
Author
McCormac
On the bench
McCormac, Reilly, Strausbaugh
Cited by
10 cases

permitting mandamus review of order that reversed a prior final order regarding treatment

How later courts described this case

  • permitting mandamus review of order that reversed a prior final order regarding treatment

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McCormac, J.,

concurring. I concur on the basis that the petition in mandamus states a claim for relief, as the Industrial Commission had no jurisdiction to change a prior unappealed order unless there was fraud, new or changed circumstances occurring subsequent to the order, or a mistake prejudicing one of the parties. The petition alleges that the Industrial Commission abused its discretion in reversing a prior order. Therefore, the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted must be overruled.

In addition, the movant has not established that he is entitled to summary judgment as to whether there was a proper basis for the Industrial Commission to make the order.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.