Opinion

Weber v. United States

  • 3 Cust. Ct. 8
  • 1939 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1742
Court
United States Customs Court
Filed
Jul 10, 1939
Status
Published
Author
Sullivan
On the bench
Bbown, McClelland, Sullivan
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

CONCURRING OPINION

Sullivan, Judge:

I still adhere to our opinion in Herman Weber v. United States, T. D. 48248, 69 Treas. Dec. 631 , which was affirmed by the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in 24 C. C. P. A. 349, T. D. 48803. The facts are somewhat different in the case at bar, although the distinction is not clear.

*11 Under the circumstances and the facts disclosed in the present record, while adhering to the judgment in the Weber case, sufra, I concur in the conclusion reached by Judge McClelland.

The opinion of Judge McClelland does not in any way attempt to reverse the decision in the Weber case, supra. It merely asserts that the facts in the case at bar are somewhat different from those in the prior case

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.