Opinion

Green v. Brown

  • 4 Vet. App. 382
  • 1993 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 96
  • 1993 WL 68557
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Mar 15, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Steinberg
On the bench
Mankin, Nebeker, Steinberg
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.1%

The opinion

STEINBERG, Associate Judge,

dissenting:

I agree with the majority that the appellant’s claim was not eligible to be reopened because new and material evidence was not presented with respect to that claim. However, for the reasons set forth in my opinion, concurring in part and dissenting in part, in McGinnis v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 239, 244-47 (1992), I cannot agree with the decision to vacate the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. The Board’s error in reaching the merits was harmless and the denial of benefits should be affirmed in the same manner as it has been in over 15 cases decided by panels of this Court. See McGinnis, 4 Vet.App. at 245 . The divided Court’s aberrational disposition in McGin-nis should not be replicated.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.