The opinion
I concur in affirming the judgment of the circuit court, because the recorder’s certificate do.es not show that this claim was one acted on under the laws of 1832 & 33. 1 am not well informed as to the validity or invalidity of the pa- • . *106 tent, but am decidedly of opinion that there has been no title previous to the patent, on which the action of ejectment can be sustained under our statute.
Scott, Judge.