Opinion

Scott v. Principi

  • 3 Vet. App. 352
  • 1992 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 333
  • 1992 WL 275879
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Oct 9, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Kramer
On the bench
Ivers, Kramer, Steinberg
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.1%

Kramer and Steinberg, JJ., concurring separately

How later courts described this case

  • Kramer and Steinberg, JJ., concurring separately

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

KRAMER, Associate Judge,

concurring:

I agree with the result obtained in Judge Ivers’ opinion and the analysis used to obtain that result, except that I would not require appellant to prove her status as a spouse of the veteran by a preponderance of the evidence. As stated in my concurring opinion in Aguilar v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 21, 23-24 (1991), status is but one element of a claim and should not be held to a burden of proof different than any other element.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.