Opinion

People ex rel. Attorney General v. Tool

  • 35 Colo. 225
Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Filed
Sep 15, 1905
Status
Published
Author
Steele
On the bench
Abbert, Gabbert, Outer, Steele
Cited by
33 cases

explaining that sovereignty involves a state's power to execute its laws

How later courts described this case

  • explaining that sovereignty involves a state's power to execute its laws
  • “[E]quity will afford protection by enjoining crime when rights and interests are injuriously affected thereby.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Steele, J.,

dissenting (orally).

I dissent from the judgment, because, in my opinion, it is unwarranted, without precedent, and directly contrary to the law.

Note: The decision on this motion was announced prior to April 5, 1905.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.