Opinion

Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement

  • 68 Ark. App. 88
  • 5 S.W.3d 58
  • 1999 Ark. App. LEXIS 756
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Nov 17, 1999
Status
Published
Author
Crabtree
On the bench
Agree, Crabtree, Griffen, Hart, Jennings, Rogers, Stroud
Cited by
4 cases

Reversed by Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement, 341 Ark. 349 (2000)

The opinion

Terry Crabtree, Judge, concurring. I concur in the result of this case but not without some pause to consider its full implications. In my opinion, the decision we address in this case should be decided on a case-by-case basis. The chancellor is in the best position to determine the needs of the parties and what income is available for the support of the minor children. While I agree with Judge Griffen that people with disabilities should enjoy at least a minimum standard of living, I also believe that each person who brings a child into this world should bear some responsibility for the child’s upbringing. It is not enough to say that funds are not available to support a child; sacrifice is required by all who are parents. In my opinion, it is but a small sacrifice to give up smoking to support, in some small way, our own children.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.