Opinion

May v. Hutson

  • 54 Ark. 226
  • 15 S.W. 606
  • 1891 Ark. LEXIS 38
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Feb 21, 1891
Status
Published
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.3%

The opinion

Per Curiam. Amendmentof schedule, The petition for a supesedeas filed by the r * ... appellee is defective in two particulars, viz., it does not state that he is a resident of the State, or that it contains a description of all the defendant’s property, both real and personal. Without the allegations of both facts, it was insufficient to warrant the issuance of a supersedeas. Brown v. Peters, 53 Ark., 182. The petition is subject to amendment. If the facts justify it, both defects may be cured by amendment.

Reverse and remand for further proceedings.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.