observing that the defendant’s conduct of “sexting” that resulted in his predicate convictions for using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct is “much less severe and harmful to * * * victims” than the “offense of rape by forcible compulsion”
How later courts described this case
- observing that the defendant’s conduct of “sexting” that resulted in his predicate convictions for using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct is “much less severe and harmful to * * * victims” than the “offense of rape by forcible compulsion”
- noting that the defendant “neither was physically present when the victims made the nude self-portraits nor was he there to direct them to engage in poses or sexual behavior while he recorded them”
- relating landscape of Article I, section 16, decisions
- summarizing legislative history of ORS 163.670
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.