Opinion

Marshall County Board of Education v. State Tenure Commission

  • 50 Ala. App. 426
  • 280 So. 2d 119
  • 1973 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 442
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Mar 21, 1973
Status
Published
Author
Holmes
On the bench
Holmes, Wright, Bradley
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.8%

The opinion

ON REHEARING

HOLMES, Judge.

The Marshall County Board of Education, in its application for rehearing and brief in support thereof, contends that in that portion of our opinion remanding this cause to the -circuit court with directions that the circuit court remand the cause to the Tenure Commission to- determine if the “status” of Arthur Baugh had been changed, we are in conflict with the decision, in this matter, of the supreme court.

Able counsel bases his contention on his belief that the supreme court, in its decision, *427 determined that a transfer in this instance did not change Arthur Baugh’s status. We do not agree.

The supreme court ruled in 291 Ala. 273 , 280 So.2d 114 (1973) that “status” applies to continuing service status and basic salary and not to the same position in another school. The supreme court did not determine whether or not Arthur Baugh’s basic salary is or would be the same after transfer nor has this court. This is a determination for the Tenure Commission or the parties themselves.

Opinion extended and application for rehearing denied.

WRIGHT, P. J., and BRADLEY, J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.