Opinion

Weight v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

  • 81 Pa. Commw. 354
  • 473 A.2d 737
  • 1984 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1322
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 5, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Rogers
On the bench
Bogers, Craig, Doyle, Rogers
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Rogers:

I respectfully dissent because I believe that there is insufficient evidence in this record supporting the majority’s conclusion that Form ETA 8-43 is a military document within the meaning of 20 C.F.R. §§614.4 and 614.8. Indeed, the letters “ETA” denote the Employment and Training Administration in the United States Department of Labor. It is entirely possible that ETA 8-43 is the form approved by competent federal authority for reporting to state compensation agencies the reasons for the termination of military personnel. If so, it would constitute the required military document.

I would vacate the order below tand remand the case for further hearings, findings and a decision of the compensation authorities with respect to whether ETA 8-43 is or is not a military document.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.