Opinion

Steinberg v. Commonwealth

46 Pa. Commw. 105
405 A.2d 1135
1979 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1991

Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed: Sep 19, 1979
Status: Published
Author: Disalle
On the bench: Blatt, Bowman, Craig, Crumlish, Disalle, MacPhail, Menoer, Rogers, Wilkinson
Cited by: 6 cases
Authority: More cited than 9.1%

Distinguished

Distinguished by Wareham v. Jeffes, 46 Pa. D. & C.3d 3 (1987)
Moreover, the facts in Steinberg are inapposite to the case at bar.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia CountySep 9, 1987Read it

The opinion

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Judge DiSalle :

With regard to those matters concerning the individual defendants, Koht and Rogers, I concur in the majority opinion. With regard to the preliminary objections of the Department of Public Welfare and the Youth Development Center, however, I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Brungard v. Hartman, 46 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 10 , 405 A.2d 1089 (1979).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.