Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Smith

  • 25 Pa. Commw. 471
  • 360 A.2d 833
  • 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1141
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jul 15, 1976
Status
Published
Author
Wilkinson
On the bench
Crumlish, Mencer, Wilkinson
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 91.9%

claimant suffering from arthritis and peptic ulcer

How later courts described this case

  • claimant suffering from arthritis and peptic ulcer

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

Appellant was employed by the United States Government for over 22 years, until January 24, 1974,, when he received a disability retirement. The position held by appellant was a tension producing, sedentary job. Appellant’s medical condition, gouty arthritis and a peptic ulcer, required his employment termination. By appellant’s own doctor’s certification, he cannot work at any job which would require prolonged standing, walking or sitting, nor any job which would produce high tension.

. The Bureau of Employment Security (Bureau) rejected appellant’s claim for unemployment compensation on the grounds that appellant was not able and available for work as required by Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. 5.801(d). The referee, after a hearing, affirmed the decision of the Bureau and the *473 Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed the referee. It is the decision of the Board that is now on appeal to this Court.

The determination of availability is largely a question of fact for the Board. Baker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 503 , 336 A.2d 671 (1975); Graham v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 14 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 445 , 322 A.2d 807 (1974). Here, the Board determined that the severe medical restrictions placed on appellant make him unavailable to accept suitable employment.

In Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Sanchez, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 353 , 346 A. 2d 390 (1975), we held a claimant unavailable for work where, due to a heart condition, he restricted the kind and length of work he would accept. See also Palovich Unemployment Compensation Case, 194 Pa. Superior Ct. 198 , 166 A.2d 339 (1960); Romiski Unemployment Compensation Case, 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 106 , 82 A.2d 565 (1951). As we noted in Sanchez , a rule which would not disqualify an applicant for unemployment compensation benefits who was determined to be unavailable for work due to medical restrictions would transform unemployment compensation into health insurance. D’Yantone Unemployment Compensation Case, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 15 , 46 A.2d 525 (1946).

Accordingly, we will enter the following

Order

Now, July 15, 1976, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Decision No. B-124992, dated March 20, 1975, affirming the decision of the referee and denying unemployment compensation benefits to Oliver L. Smith, is hereby affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.