Opinion

Raum v. Board of Supervisors

  • 20 Pa. Commw. 426
  • 342 A.2d 450
  • 1975 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1110
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jul 25, 1975
Status
Published
Author
Mencer
On the bench
Blatt, Bowman, Crumlish, Kramer, Mencer, Rogers, Wilkinson
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.0%

The opinion

Concurring Opinion by

Judge Mencer :

I concur in the result reached here and with the majority opinion except the determination that the Main Line appellants have standing to appeal. I do not view any of them as an “aggrieved person” within the meaning of Section 1005 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, as amended, 53 P.S. §11005. See Louden Hill Farm, Inc. v. Milk Control Commission, 420 Pa. 548 , 217 A. 2d 735 (1966); Atlee Estate, 406 Pa. 528 , 178 A. 2d 722 (1962); Levitt and Sons, Inc. v. Kane, 4 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 375 , 285 A. 2d 917 (1972).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.