Opinion

Kreider v. Commonwealth

  • 9 Pa. Commw. 491
  • 308 A.2d 642
  • 1973 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 649
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Aug 9, 1973
Status
Published
Author
Crumlish
On the bench
Blatt, Bowman, Crumlish, Kramer, Mencer, Orumlish, Rogers, Wilkinson
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.0%

decided after Brown, but without citation thereto

How later courts described this case

  • decided after Brown, but without citation thereto
  • Pa. Human Relations Commission
  • Pa. Human Relations Comm’n

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Concurring Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.:

While I concur in the result reached by the majority and that part of the majority opinion which states that the exclusive jurisdiction for claims against the Commonwealth arising from contracts rests with the Board of Arbitration of Claims, I feel it is necessary to once again reiterate that my position on the doctrine of sovereign immunity remains as stated in Duquesne Light Company v. Department of Transportation, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 364 , 295 A. 2d 351 (1972); Lovrinoff v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 161 , 281 A. 2d 176 (1971); Brown v. National Guard, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 457 (1971).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.