The opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-47,915-04
EX PARTE RICHARD CHARLES FININEN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 2015F00270A IN THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM CASS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Applicant was convicted of bail jumping and failure to appear and sentenced to forty years’
imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Fininen v. State, No. 06-16-
00039-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Oct. 27, 2016)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed
this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that conviction
had been affirmed. Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant was not
informed of the appellate court’s decision and that Applicant would have timely filed a petition for
discretionary review but for his lack of notice.
2
Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,
180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for
discretionary review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in cause number. Should Applicant
decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this Court within thirty days
from the date of this Court’s mandate.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional
Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
Delivered: May 18, 2022
Do not publish