Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

  • 277 Pa. Super. 316
  • 419 A.2d 790
  • 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2563
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
May 16, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Spaeth
On the bench
Cavanaugh, Files, Hester, Spaeth
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

SPAETH, Judge,

concurring:

I agree with the majority that appellant did not voluntarily and knowingly waive his right to file post-verdict motions and so should be permitted to file them nunc pro tune. However, I do not agree with the majority that Pa.R. Crim.P. 1123(b) requires a special warning not required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123(c). If before accepting the defendant’s waiver of his right to file post-verdict motions the trial judge advises the defendant pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123(c), that is sufficient.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.