Opinion

In re Sentry Security, Inc.

  • 259 Pa. Super. 385
  • 393 A.2d 880
  • 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3813
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Oct 20, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Price
On the bench
Cer, Cone, Consideration, Files, Hester, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Voort
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.5%

The opinion

PRICE, Judge,

concurring:

I concur in the result reached by the majority. I still adhere to my position that the test as annunciated by the majority in In re Application for Private Detective License of Leo A. Harding, Appellant, 246 Pa.Super. 180 , 369 A.2d 871 (1977), is incorrect. However, based upon this record I believe that the appellant has satisfied the requirements as specifically required by the statute.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.