45 half spoon packets of heroin, 11 packets of cocaine, packaging equipment, and large amount of cash
How later courts described this case
- 45 half spoon packets of heroin, 11 packets of cocaine, packaging equipment, and large amount of cash
- 25 packets, 17 bundles, half pound of heroin, and cutting and packaging equipment
- possession of 25 packets by defendant proved not to be user
- expert testimony that 71 packets were bundled as seller would do
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
SPAETH, J.,
dissented. Compare this case (56 bags, no evidence of degree of dilution) with Commonwealth v. Santi *608 ago, 462 Pa. 216 , 340 A.2d 440 (1975) (25 packets, 17 bundles, half pound of heroin, and cutting and packaging equipment); Commonwealth v. Hill, 236 Pa.Super. 572 , 346 A.2d 314 (1975) (45 half spoon packets of heroin, 11 packets of cocaine, packaging equipment, and large amount of cash); Commonwealth v. Wright, 234 Pa.Super. 83 , 339 A.2d 103 (1975) (possession of 25 packets by defendant proved not to be user); Commonwealth v. Brown, 232 Pa.Super. 463 , 335 A.2d 782 (1975) (expert testimony that 71 packets were bundled as seller would do).