Opinion

In re Hill

  • 248 Pa. Super. 415
  • 375 A.2d 165
  • 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2010
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 29, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Spaeth
On the bench
Cercone, Files, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Voort, Watkins
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.5%

remand where “[w]e are not able to say with certainty how much weight was afforded the improperly admitted report.”

How later courts described this case

  • remand where “[w]e are not able to say with certainty how much weight was afforded the improperly admitted report.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SPAETH, Judge,

concurring:

I agree that the case should be remanded, on the understanding that the lower court is to apply the stand articulated in In re Hernandez, 249 Pa.Super. -, 376 A.2d 648 (1977).

HOFFMAN, J., joins in this concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.