Opinion

Commonwealth v. Holm

  • 233 Pa. Super. 281
  • 335 A.2d 713
  • 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1458
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 31, 1975
Status
Published
Author
Spaeth
On the bench
Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Voort, Watkins
Cited by
14 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.5%

failure to pay costs of prosecution because of indigency

How later courts described this case

  • failure to pay costs of prosecution because of indigency

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Concurring Opinion by

Spaeth, J.:

I join Part I of Judge Cercone’s opinion. I do not join Part II but concur in the result reached there. As I understand Part II, it holds that the Commonwealth did not have to show, and the hearing judge did not have to find, that appellant’s failure to meet the conditions of his probation was wilful. In Commonwealth v. Rooney, 283 Pa. Superior Ct. 225 , 335 A.2d 710 (1975), we left open the question whether probation could be revoked for less than wilful conduct. I would still leave it open, for in my view the Commonwealth did show that appellant’s conduct was wilful.

Hoffman, J., joins in this opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.