Opinion

Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.

  • 209 Pa. Super. 298
  • 228 A.2d 217
  • 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1225
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 23, 1967
Status
Published
Author
Pee
On the bench
Ervin, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Pee, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 93.5%

The opinion

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, remitting the record in a workmen’s compensation case to the Board for additional findings of fact.

Although orders of this character are generally considered interlocutory, Wilk v. The Budd Company, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 108 , 100 A. 2d 127 (1953), we are not without power to review them. Barber v. Fleming Raugh, Inc., 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 230 , 222 A. 2d 423 (1966); Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Company, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 460 , 69 A. 2d 192 (1949).

After thorough and independent study, we are of the opinion that the record before us is sufficient to permit the lower court to decide the case on the merits. The order of the lower court is therefore reversed, and the record is remanded to it for that purpose.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.