Opinion

Nicholas Medvid, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

  • 555 Pa. 85
  • 722 A.2d 1054
  • 1999 Pa. LEXIS 250
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Feb 8, 1999
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 1999, Petitioner James Shady’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED to the extent that it reinstates the workers compensation judge’s *86 decision granting Respondent’s petition to modify Petitioner James Shady’s benefits using calculations based on the salary of the copywriter’s job, and the case is REMANDED to the workers compensation judge with directions to recalculate the modification of Petitioner James Shady’s benefits based on the salary of the higher paying of the following two jobs that Petitioner was referred to and failed to pursue in good faith: 1.) the cashier’s job at Ruthfred Food Market; and 2.) the position as a teen parent program facilitator at From Birth to Five.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Medvid, Inc.’s Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.