Opinion

Federici v. Borough of Oakmont Zoning Hearing Board

  • 531 Pa. 454
  • 613 A.2d 1205
  • 1992 Pa. LEXIS 481
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Oct 14, 1992
Status
Published
On the bench
Appeal, Cappy, Consideration, Flaherty, Larsen, Matter, Merits, Nix, Papadakos, Reach, Zappala
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 50.7%

zoning hearing board was without standing to appeal reversal of its decision

How later courts described this case

  • zoning hearing board was without standing to appeal reversal of its decision

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*455 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Motion to Quash Appeal is GRANTED. A Zoning Hearing Board has no standing to appeal from a decision of a reviewing Court which involves one of its own decisions. See Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Association, 505 Pa. 614 , 483 A.2d 448 (1984); Edwards Zoning Case, 392 Pa. 188 , 140 A.2d 110 (1958); Lansdowne Board of Adjustment’s Appeal, 313 Pa. 523 , 170 A. 867 (1934).

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

CAPPY, J., dissents and would reach the merits of the appeal.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.