Opinion

Frazee v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

  • 508 Pa. 50
  • 494 A.2d 367
  • 1985 Pa. LEXIS 342
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 17, 1985
Status
Published
On the bench
Flaherty, Hutchinson, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.2%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The direct appeal is quashed. 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a); O’Brien v. Commonwealth, State Employes’ Retirement System, 503 Pa. 414 , 469 A.2d 1008 (1983), cert. denied, — *51 U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 83 , 83 L.Ed.2d 30 (1984); XPress Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 503 Pa. 399 , 469 A.2d 1000 (1983); Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors, 503 Pa. 392 , 469 A.2d 996 (1983); Pennsylvania Department of Aging v. Lindberg, 503 Pa. 423 , 469 A.2d 1012 (1983). Treating appellant’s papers as a petition for allowance of appeal, 42 Pa.C.S. § 724(b), Pa.R.A.P. 1103, the petition is dismissed because it is not ripe and no final order has been entered on the appellant’s currently pending Commonwealth Court appeal from the Unemployment Compensation Board’s order denying benefits. 42 Pa.C.S. § 724(a).

The record is remanded to Commonwealth Court for appropriate consideration of appellant’s request for review of the Unemployment Compensation Board’s order denying benefits.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.