recognizing “a special duty of care” on the part of a railroad toward motorists at a crossing with “a dangerously limited view”
How later courts described this case
- recognizing “a special duty of care” on the part of a railroad toward motorists at a crossing with “a dangerously limited view”
- unobstructed view possible only by placing vehicle into swath of oncoming train and failure of train to sound whistle
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Concurring Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen :
While I join in Mr. Justice Barbieri’s opinion, I feel compelled to add that in a proper case I will urge *159 this Court to re-evaluate several prior decisions applying to the “Stop, Look and Listen” rule.