Opinion

Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

  • 430 Pa. 101
  • 242 A.2d 454
  • 1968 Pa. LEXIS 678
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jan 9, 1968
Status
Published
Author
Bell
On the bench
Beien, Bell, Cohen, Eagen, Jones, Musmanno, Robeets, Roberts
Cited by
109 cases

union made no offer to continue working and voted to strike in advance of the contract’s expiration

How later courts described this case

  • union made no offer to continue working and voted to strike in advance of the contract’s expiration

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Concurring Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell:

I join in the Opinion of the Court, but desire to emphasize as the majority Opinion writer does, that the question of whether a work stoppage is a strike or a *111 lock-out is almost always a mixed question of fact and law.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.