Opinion

Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. White Cross Stores, Inc.

  • 414 Pa. 95
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 26, 1964
Status
Published
Author
Jones
On the bench
Bell, Brien, Cohen, Eagen, Jones, Musmanno, Roberts
Cited by
53 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.2%

holding that the General Assembly may delegate regulatory power to “responsible governmental agencies,” but not to private persons

How later courts described this case

  • holding that the General Assembly may delegate regulatory power to “responsible governmental agencies,” but not to private persons
  • holding unconstitutional the Pennsylvania Fair Trade Act as applied to nonsigners of price maintenance contracts
  • stating that the Legislature has the exclusive responsibility to enunciate public policy
  • “The vesting of a discretionary regulatory power over prices, rates or wages, in private persons violates the essential concept of a democratic society and is constitutionally invalid.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones:

We are now asked to declare invalid the Fair Trade Act. The reasons assigned are economic in nature. Appeal for invalidation of this statute on such grounds should be addressed to the legislature, not this court.

I believe that the rationale of Burche Co. v. General Electric Co., 382 Pa. 370 , 115 A. 2d 361 , is sound and that Burche controls the case at bar.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.